Background
Byron Court is a big school, with more than 750 pupils, in year groups of between three- and five-form entry. The school decided to invest in Maths - No Problem!books, after the current Assistant Head for Curriculum and Assessment, Jack Corson, joined the school. His previous school, in east London, had participated in the Maths Hubs textbook trial in 2015/16.
‘We first trialled it in Y1 (four forms) for all of the spring and summer terms,’ says Jack. ‘That was very positive in terms of children’s learning and teachers’ experience, so we thought it was worth scaling up.’
‘We now have at least a half-class set of textbooks for every class in the school. In addition, every child has their own personal workbook, and we subscribe to the online teacher guides.’
‘The initial investment was around £25,000, and the annual ongoing expense, to replace the workbooks is about half that.’
[NB: The size of this school’s spending reflects the very large size of the school. Equivalent book-per-pupil outlay in smaller schools would be much smaller.]
How they are used
Several teachers at the school have been on the Maths - No Problem! training and, as a result, maths teaching across the school to a large degree mirrors the lesson structure advocated by Maths - No Problem!, which itself reflects maths teaching in Singapore.
In a typical lesson following that structure, pupils will first explore some maths from the textbook, projected on the board, then discuss it in detail with the teacher and with each other, and move on to recording (journalling) in their own exercise books. Only then will the textbooks come out, for what is called guided practice (working through questions and drawing out key points from the textbook). This is followed by independent practice: each pupil completing questions in their own workbook.
‘I think the key thing is subject knowledge and children building on their knowledge from one year to the next,’ says Jack. ‘Otherwise we would have teachers who have had little subject-specific training trying to design lessons, which is very time-consuming, and the lessons would vary according to their expertise in maths.’
The benefits
‘A key benefit,’ says Jack, ‘is that every single teacher, rather than spending time making something from scratch, can use this really high quality resource, where all the material comes from a curriculum in Singapore which has been developed over four decades, and which has been designed intelligently.’
‘That means that our staff can spend the time that they would otherwise spend planning, looking at the materials and thinking about how they can deliver this really well.’
‘The broad structure of lessons is consistent throughout the school. But we don’t want teachers sticking too rigidly to it. It might vary slightly. Each teacher will judge, based on what the children can do and what they are struggling with, how long each section lasts.’
Minesh Randeria, Head of Maths, has noticed an improvement in teacher subject knowledge.
‘Maths - No Problem! has really assisted us in terms of teachers’ subject knowledge, which, in turn has an impact on children’s subject knowledge. Teachers now understand what it means for the children to understand the subject more deeply.’
‘The book also encourages children to use different methods and to realise that making mistakes can be a means to learn something.’
Minesh says another benefit flows from the fact that teachers are all delivering the same material.
‘This means the teachers in each year group can have informal conversations, knowing they are talking about the same thing.’
Usage since lockdown
The Maths—No Problem! textbooks have been used by teachers in planning work sent home, and some Year 6 pupils took books home themselves. Continuing to draw on the textbooks in all maths work during the lockdown period has also meant that, once pupils start coming back to school, teachers have a better idea of what has, and hasn’t, been covered.
Head of Maths, Minesh Randeria says:
‘The textbooks have been extremely useful with regards to teaching through online platforms. Most year groups used them in a similar way, posting pictures of ‘in focus’ tasks and guided practice questions alongside prompting questions written by the teachers. These were then completed by the children, and staff could see if there were common misconceptions which required addressing, just as they would have if the children were in class.’